Peter Cook, Entertainment Tower, Montreal, Canada, 1963 

Peter Cook, Entertainment Tower, Montreal, Canada, 1963 

(via radarqnet)

@7 months ago with 82 notes
#peter cook #architecture #montreal #drawing 

Arcadia City [1977/1978] by Peter Cook + Christine Hawley

More info: Arqueología del Futuro

Arcadia City [1977/1978] by Peter Cook + Christine Hawley

More info: Arqueología del Futuro

@1 year ago with 18 notes
#peter cook #christine hawley #drawing #elevation #architecture 

Peter Cook | Architecture: action and plan

via archidose

@1 year ago with 10 notes
#peter cook #book #architecture #archidose 
Biblioteca Publica de Mexico | Alberto Kalach
Peter Cook evokes the existence of the incredible building that is the Biblioteca Publica of  Mexico City by Alberto Kalach. This Mexican  Architect seems to have succeed to create a library influenced by both  Borges’ fantastic atmosphere and Kafka’s ambiguous and intriguing  fascination for bureaucracy.The beautiful pictures from Tomás Casademunt succeeds to  reinforce in an incredible way this feeling.

Biblioteca Publica de Mexico | Alberto Kalach

Peter Cook evokes the existence of the incredible building that is the Biblioteca Publica of Mexico City by Alberto Kalach. This Mexican Architect seems to have succeed to create a library influenced by both Borges’ fantastic atmosphere and Kafka’s ambiguous and intriguing fascination for bureaucracy.
The beautiful pictures from Tomás Casademunt succeeds to reinforce in an incredible way this feeling.

@2 years ago with 2 notes
#tomas cadademunt #alberto kalach #peter cook #boiteaoutils #architecture #library #mexico city #bw 

"

Sections are out of fashion at the moment, but due for a revival. That most delightful of drawing types, they are able to offer both ‘picture’ and ‘organization’. After all, a plan serves to deal with organization and an elevation gives a picture. Both of these can be total - as far as they go. Various types of three dimensional drawing can give a picture, but however evocative, it is biased - a directional - view. The section is the aficionado’s choice. Buildings can be infinitely debated through the forensic analysis of a section. The virtuoso manipulator will recognize in another’s section his wit and her architectural literacy.

The section is perhaps the most irritating and intangible form of architects’ drawing for the untrained eye. It confounds those critics who try to ascribe a value system that is not based upon form and operation (a larger contingent than is strictly necessary). It is a joy. The long section of the Kunsthaus Graz says it all. It is both technical and conceptual.

"

Peter Cook | The motive force of architecture
@2 years ago with 63 notes
#architecture #peter cook #section #quote #drawings 
The motive force of architecture | Peter Cook
@2 years ago with 3 notes
#neil denari, #peter cook #architecture 

PETER COOK

WAY OUT WEST-BERLIN, 1988

PETER COOK

WAY OUT WEST-BERLIN, 1988

(via archidose)

@1 year ago with 63 notes
#peter cook #berlin #mapping #architecture 
Mechanical Living | Nelson Larroque
Mechanical Living is a project designed by Nelson Larroque within Peter Cook’s studio at the Ecole Speciale d’Architecture in Paris.  This project is a very literal vision of dwellings created in former  industrial sites which facilities manage to supply energy.

Mechanical Living | Nelson Larroque

Mechanical Living is a project designed by Nelson Larroque within Peter Cook’s studio at the Ecole Speciale d’Architecture in Paris. This project is a very literal vision of dwellings created in former industrial sites which facilities manage to supply energy.

@1 year ago with 4 notes
#peter cook #nelson larroque #architecture #mechanical #proposal 
Peter Cook | a tower  for SWISS COTTAGE

Peter Cook | a tower for SWISS COTTAGE

@2 years ago with 94 notes
#peter cook #illustration #architecture #london 
THE FINER GRAINS OF RADICALISM
Richness of investigation that can be found in the grain of the work  distinguishes certain exploratory architecture that has been going on in  London for the last 30 years. Given that the resulting compositions are  sometimes weird, there is a tendency for outside observers to admire  its craftsmanship (as drawing or physical fashioning—or its will to surf  between various modes and programs of digitalization). Such observers  often seem shy to discuss its uncomfortable relationship with either the  Broad Mainstream of built and projected architecture or the more  shrilly political/theoretical thrusts of European Statements and  Positions. A clue might be found in listening to a Review session at the  Bartlett School—where all of the exhibiters are to be found. A certain  tradition of discussion still lingers—far less “positional” than an  American session and less declamatory than in France or Germany. The  non-British are often puzzled that a discussion can stray far away from  the motives or maneuvers of the project and engage in speculation,  whimsy, pernickety detail, gossip, nostalgia, raconteurship and probably  avoid (at all costs) the definition of the project as “good” or “bad.”  The same waywardness has often been observed in the English Novel, where  identification of good, evil, heroism or villainy are replaced by messy  and complex situations—but full of intriguing side-issues that months  later strike you as containing the essence of the message. Of course  only two of our exhibitors are English by birth and the territories that  they severally explore range from the imagined to the prosaic, the  delirious to the stubbornly measurable. Yet the common culture they  share is of teaching or studying in a school where individuality has  been cherished and the teachers have a tendency to re-define their  interests without notice. Those same speculations, details and an  assumed mandate to slither from one territory to another are then  interpreted through formal objects and drawn imagery.
Sometimes the Bartlett is assumed to be hung up on gadgetry,  sometimes on an over-refinement of the drawn (or plotted) line.  Sometimes it’s believed to wallow in fantasy: yet its graduates are  statistically the most desired by offices in a city with a dozen nearby  schools—as well as the plane-loads that come over from the technische  hochschulen. When Eric Moss asked me to round up some specimens, I  had no second thoughts that these three syndromes were the ones to  have—anyhow, anywhere and not as much to make a pedagogic point as to  simply get some great stuff on the wall. All of them at their best when  being full-on—or should I say, fully indulgent. The art of indulgence is  a threatened species. God preserve us from all those reasonable architects,  those cool manners, those careful Buildings—go look  elsewhere for that—there’s plenty of it around.
PETER COOK | The London Eight « LEBBEUS WOODS

THE FINER GRAINS OF RADICALISM

Richness of investigation that can be found in the grain of the work distinguishes certain exploratory architecture that has been going on in London for the last 30 years. Given that the resulting compositions are sometimes weird, there is a tendency for outside observers to admire its craftsmanship (as drawing or physical fashioning—or its will to surf between various modes and programs of digitalization). Such observers often seem shy to discuss its uncomfortable relationship with either the Broad Mainstream of built and projected architecture or the more shrilly political/theoretical thrusts of European Statements and Positions. A clue might be found in listening to a Review session at the Bartlett School—where all of the exhibiters are to be found. A certain tradition of discussion still lingers—far less “positional” than an American session and less declamatory than in France or Germany. The non-British are often puzzled that a discussion can stray far away from the motives or maneuvers of the project and engage in speculation, whimsy, pernickety detail, gossip, nostalgia, raconteurship and probably avoid (at all costs) the definition of the project as “good” or “bad.” The same waywardness has often been observed in the English Novel, where identification of good, evil, heroism or villainy are replaced by messy and complex situations—but full of intriguing side-issues that months later strike you as containing the essence of the message. Of course only two of our exhibitors are English by birth and the territories that they severally explore range from the imagined to the prosaic, the delirious to the stubbornly measurable. Yet the common culture they share is of teaching or studying in a school where individuality has been cherished and the teachers have a tendency to re-define their interests without notice. Those same speculations, details and an assumed mandate to slither from one territory to another are then interpreted through formal objects and drawn imagery.

Sometimes the Bartlett is assumed to be hung up on gadgetry, sometimes on an over-refinement of the drawn (or plotted) line. Sometimes it’s believed to wallow in fantasy: yet its graduates are statistically the most desired by offices in a city with a dozen nearby schools—as well as the plane-loads that come over from the technische hochschulen. When Eric Moss asked me to round up some specimens, I had no second thoughts that these three syndromes were the ones to have—anyhow, anywhere and not as much to make a pedagogic point as to simply get some great stuff on the wall. All of them at their best when being full-on—or should I say, fully indulgent. The art of indulgence is a threatened species. God preserve us from all those reasonable architects, those cool manners, those careful Buildings—go look elsewhere for that—there’s plenty of it around.

PETER COOK | The London Eight « LEBBEUS WOODS

@2 years ago with 8 notes
#lebbeus woods #architecture #peter cook #london eight #scale model 

"it is not always best for drawings to be accurate: better sometimes for them to insert moments of a dream or a diversion into the otherise commonplace procedure of describing and organizing."

peter cook | the motive force of architecture
@2 years ago with 5 notes
#peter cook #architecture #drawing #quote 
Peter Cook | Plug-In City
via betac

Peter Cook | Plug-In City

via betac

@2 years ago with 12 notes
#archigram #peter cook #plug-in city #architecture #drawing #betac 

Peter Cook, Entertainment Tower, Montreal, Canada, 1963 
7 months ago
#peter cook #architecture #montreal #drawing 

PETER COOK

WAY OUT WEST-BERLIN, 1988
1 year ago
#peter cook #berlin #mapping #architecture 

Arcadia City [1977/1978] by Peter Cook + Christine Hawley

More info: Arqueología del Futuro
1 year ago
#peter cook #christine hawley #drawing #elevation #architecture 
Mechanical Living | Nelson Larroque
Mechanical Living is a project designed by Nelson Larroque within Peter Cook’s studio at the Ecole Speciale d’Architecture in Paris.  This project is a very literal vision of dwellings created in former  industrial sites which facilities manage to supply energy.
1 year ago
#peter cook #nelson larroque #architecture #mechanical #proposal 
1 year ago
#peter cook #book #architecture #archidose 
Peter Cook | a tower  for SWISS COTTAGE
2 years ago
#peter cook #illustration #architecture #london 
Biblioteca Publica de Mexico | Alberto Kalach
Peter Cook evokes the existence of the incredible building that is the Biblioteca Publica of  Mexico City by Alberto Kalach. This Mexican  Architect seems to have succeed to create a library influenced by both  Borges’ fantastic atmosphere and Kafka’s ambiguous and intriguing  fascination for bureaucracy.The beautiful pictures from Tomás Casademunt succeeds to  reinforce in an incredible way this feeling.
2 years ago
#tomas cadademunt #alberto kalach #peter cook #boiteaoutils #architecture #library #mexico city #bw 
THE FINER GRAINS OF RADICALISM
Richness of investigation that can be found in the grain of the work  distinguishes certain exploratory architecture that has been going on in  London for the last 30 years. Given that the resulting compositions are  sometimes weird, there is a tendency for outside observers to admire  its craftsmanship (as drawing or physical fashioning—or its will to surf  between various modes and programs of digitalization). Such observers  often seem shy to discuss its uncomfortable relationship with either the  Broad Mainstream of built and projected architecture or the more  shrilly political/theoretical thrusts of European Statements and  Positions. A clue might be found in listening to a Review session at the  Bartlett School—where all of the exhibiters are to be found. A certain  tradition of discussion still lingers—far less “positional” than an  American session and less declamatory than in France or Germany. The  non-British are often puzzled that a discussion can stray far away from  the motives or maneuvers of the project and engage in speculation,  whimsy, pernickety detail, gossip, nostalgia, raconteurship and probably  avoid (at all costs) the definition of the project as “good” or “bad.”  The same waywardness has often been observed in the English Novel, where  identification of good, evil, heroism or villainy are replaced by messy  and complex situations—but full of intriguing side-issues that months  later strike you as containing the essence of the message. Of course  only two of our exhibitors are English by birth and the territories that  they severally explore range from the imagined to the prosaic, the  delirious to the stubbornly measurable. Yet the common culture they  share is of teaching or studying in a school where individuality has  been cherished and the teachers have a tendency to re-define their  interests without notice. Those same speculations, details and an  assumed mandate to slither from one territory to another are then  interpreted through formal objects and drawn imagery.
Sometimes the Bartlett is assumed to be hung up on gadgetry,  sometimes on an over-refinement of the drawn (or plotted) line.  Sometimes it’s believed to wallow in fantasy: yet its graduates are  statistically the most desired by offices in a city with a dozen nearby  schools—as well as the plane-loads that come over from the technische  hochschulen. When Eric Moss asked me to round up some specimens, I  had no second thoughts that these three syndromes were the ones to  have—anyhow, anywhere and not as much to make a pedagogic point as to  simply get some great stuff on the wall. All of them at their best when  being full-on—or should I say, fully indulgent. The art of indulgence is  a threatened species. God preserve us from all those reasonable architects,  those cool manners, those careful Buildings—go look  elsewhere for that—there’s plenty of it around.
PETER COOK | The London Eight « LEBBEUS WOODS
2 years ago
#lebbeus woods #architecture #peter cook #london eight #scale model 
"

Sections are out of fashion at the moment, but due for a revival. That most delightful of drawing types, they are able to offer both ‘picture’ and ‘organization’. After all, a plan serves to deal with organization and an elevation gives a picture. Both of these can be total - as far as they go. Various types of three dimensional drawing can give a picture, but however evocative, it is biased - a directional - view. The section is the aficionado’s choice. Buildings can be infinitely debated through the forensic analysis of a section. The virtuoso manipulator will recognize in another’s section his wit and her architectural literacy.

The section is perhaps the most irritating and intangible form of architects’ drawing for the untrained eye. It confounds those critics who try to ascribe a value system that is not based upon form and operation (a larger contingent than is strictly necessary). It is a joy. The long section of the Kunsthaus Graz says it all. It is both technical and conceptual.

"
Peter Cook | The motive force of architecture
2 years ago
#architecture #peter cook #section #quote #drawings 
"it is not always best for drawings to be accurate: better sometimes for them to insert moments of a dream or a diversion into the otherise commonplace procedure of describing and organizing."
peter cook | the motive force of architecture
2 years ago
#peter cook #architecture #drawing #quote 
The motive force of architecture | Peter Cook
2 years ago
#neil denari, #peter cook #architecture 
Peter Cook | Plug-In City
via betac
2 years ago
#archigram #peter cook #plug-in city #architecture #drawing #betac